In testimony before the Commission on Judicial Selection, what did the NAACP argue in favor of to achieve more diverse judgeship election results?
A. Jungle primary voting
B. Nonpartisan popular elections
C. Partisan popular elections
D. Appointment of judges
Answer (2)
The NAACP argued in favor of nonpartisan popular elections to promote diversity among judgeships in their testimony to the Commission on Judicial Selection. They believed this approach would minimize bias related to political party affiliations. Their advocacy reflects a desire for a judiciary that accurately represents community diversity. ;
The NAACP argued in favor of nonpartisan popular elections to enhance diversity in judgeship elections. They believed this approach would help eliminate biases linked to party affiliations and enable voters to focus on qualifications. This reflects a goal of creating a judiciary that accurately represents community diversity.
;
