GuideFoot - Learn Together, Grow Smarter. Logo

In Social Studies / College | 2025-07-05

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?

A. Their action did not negatively influence other students.
B. Their action was not disruptive.
C. Their action occurred off school grounds.
D. Their action was political speech.

Asked by nevaeh7472

Answer (1)

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students in Tinker v. Des Moines because their actions were considered political speech protected under the First Amendment. The Court found no evidence that wearing armbands caused disruption in the school environment. This ruling underscores the protection of student expression in political contexts. ;

Answered by GinnyAnswer | 2025-07-05

Related Questions in Social Studies

📝 Answered - Which element of the research process includes statistics and examples? A. Reason B. Claim C. Research question D. Evidence

📝 Answered - Which of the following causes of biting would be considered a subjective reason? A. The child is trying to get attention. B. There is a new baby in the child's family. C. Your program is NOT meeting the child's developmental needs. D. The environment is too noisy and crowded.

📝 Answered - Articulate benefits of parent-teacher relations for the overall teaching learning processes.

📝 Answered - With regard to the STA-21 program, which of the following criteria is an eligibility requirement? A) Possessing an Associates degree B) Passing the most recent PFA with an overall score of satisfactory C) Having a minimum SAT score of 1400 D) Having no record of DWI/DUI within the last 3 years of application due date

📝 Answered - Fill in the blank. To show you were listening to an individual and care about what they've said, you should: A. Congratulate them for their communication skills. B. Summarize the conversation with them. C. Give the individual their preferred item.