Suzuki critiques the allocation of funds to military endeavors instead of environmental and societal improvement. He believes that investing in peace and addressing poverty is a higher priority than spending on war. Thus, the correct interpretation is that peace costs more than war and poverty. ;
Suzuki critiques the spending of funds on war instead of on environmental and social improvements, believing that investing in peace and addressing poverty should be prioritized. He argues that peace requires more investment than current military expenditures. Therefore, the best interpretation of his belief is option B, which reflects that peace costs more than war and poverty.
;