GuideFoot - Learn Together, Grow Smarter. Logo

In History / High School | 2014-03-25

In 1904, the Supreme Court ruled that which of the following was a "combination in restraint of trade"?

A. Sherman Antitrust Act
B. AFL
C. Grange Movement
D. Standard Oil Company
E. Northern Securities Company

Asked by Brandenburger528

Answer (3)

The only Supreme Court of these cases that took place in 1904 was (E) Northern Securoties Company

Answered by sanaarshad64 | 2024-06-10

e. northern securities company

Answered by nkat | 2024-06-10

The Supreme Court ruled in 1904 that the Northern Securities Company was a "combination in restraint of trade" during the case Northern Securities Co. v. United States. This landmark decision enforced the Sherman Antitrust Act by dissolving the company due to its monopolistic practices concerning railroad operations. The ruling underscored the government's intent to regulate and maintain competition in the marketplace.
;

Answered by Anonymous | 2024-12-20

Related Questions in History

📝 Answered - What did the Puntans form to establish their own New World colony? A. the Mayflower Compact B. the Virginia Company C. the Massachusetts Bay Company D. the Jamestown settlement

📝 Answered - For each item listed, identify whether it was a provision of the Land Ordinance of 1785 or the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. Banned slavery Reserved a section of land for public schools Divided land into townships

📝 Answered - Heavily recruited from members of the construction trades, this unit of the military helped build installations at home and abroad during World War II. What was it called? A. Builders' Brigades B. Seabees C. Construction Cadres D. Military Masons

📝 Answered - What was true of the first settled communities in Ancient America? A. They developed egalitarian social relations B. They practiced slash and burn agriculture C. It led to increasing pastoralism D. It led to increasing urbanization

📝 Answered - Did the Progressive Era changes, like breaking up big companies, giving women the right to vote, and making new government rules, really fix the problems caused by big cities and factories? Why or why not?