An interview with the French ambassador about diplomacy in France would be considered a:

A. Primary source
B. Secondary source
C. Tertiary source
D. Fictional account

An interview with the French Ambassador about diplomacy in France would be considered a primary source (if done for research). It would also be considered oral history, if recorded. *
* Not sure if this is what you were looking for. Did you have a list of choices?

Answered by Crystal7174 | 2024-06-10

The interview with the French ambassador about diplomacy in France would be considered a primary source, as it provides first-hand accounts and original insights directly from the individual involved. Primary sources are essential for understanding the context and details of an event or subject matter. Thus, the correct choice is A. Primary source.
;

Answered by Crystal7174 | 2024-12-26